Erdan Criticizes UN Security Council Resolution, Predicts Hardened Hamas Stance in Hostage Talks

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, strongly criticized the UN Security Council’s resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during Ramadan, stating in an interview with Yediot that it would only embolden Hamas in negotiations regarding hostages.

Erdan expressed concern that Hamas had anticipated international pressure to coerce Israel into a ceasefire before achieving its objectives in the conflict. He highlighted a shift in the US stance, noting that while the US had previously resisted such pressure, the recent resolution signaled a significant change.

While acknowledging the non-binding nature of the resolution, Erdan warned of potential legal ramifications for Israel if it were accused of violating Security Council decisions. He emphasized the importance of the US-Israel relationship, asserting that both nations were mutual partners even when their interests diverged.

Erdan cautioned that the resolution would likely bolster Hamas’s resolve in negotiations, making it less inclined to agree to a ceasefire without concessions. He expressed disappointment in the US decision not to veto the proposal, believing it would hinder efforts to secure the release of hostages.

Meanwhile, Hamas indicated to mediators its commitment to its original demands, which included a complete IDF withdrawal from Gaza and a comprehensive ceasefire.

Despite US assurances that the resolution was not legally binding and that Israel would not face sanctions for non-compliance, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu announced the suspension of Israeli participation in talks in Washington.

In a separate development, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant met with US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan to discuss ongoing efforts to counter Hamas and secure the release of hostages. Gallant emphasized the importance of the outcomes of the conflict for the region’s future.

The Security Council resolution, which received overwhelming support from member states, was hailed as historic for its call for an immediate ceasefire. However, Israel expressed concerns about potential international pressure and legal implications stemming from its non-compliance with the resolution.