The Syrian war has seen no shortage of twists already this year, but this weekend, it saw one of its most consequential. On Saturday, the IDF announced that it had carried out a “large-scale” aerial attack inside Syria, after back-and-forth clashes overnight in which an Iranian drone was shot down in Syrian territory and an Israeli F-16 was downed by Syrian antiaircraft fire.
Despite its proximity, Israel has largely stood on the sidelines of the Syrian conflict over the past seven years. Saturday’s airstrikes, however, suggest that it may soon end up sucked into a conflict that is looking increasingly chaotic after the military defeat of the Islamic State. If Israel does become more engaged in the fighting next door, it could have serious consequences for the war in Syria war – and for the region as a whole.
What has Israel’s involvement in the Syrian war been so far?
Israel shares a contentious border with Syria – the Golan Heights – and it has long had openly adversarial relations with not only Bashar al-Assad’s government but with Syria’s allies Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah militia. However, Israel also had little reason to support the Islamic State or al-Qaeda-aligned Islamist groups that became the Syrian government’s primary rivals.
Still, Israel has conducted dozens of covert airstrikes against Hezbollah weapons convoys in Syria. These interventions generally were not announced publicly and were small in scale. Syrian government forces and their allies have generally refrained from responding, wary of opening up yet another front in an already chaotic conflict.
Things began to change over the past year, however, as the Islamic State lost territory and Assad’s forces and their allies regained control of the conflict.
Last year, Israel pushed back against a partial ceasefire brokered by the United States and Russia, arguing that it allowed Iranian expansion near Israel’s borders. Many in Israel feared not only that Iran and its allies would entrench themselves near the Israeli border but that Hezbollah had been using the Syrian fighting as a training and that Iran might help the militia upgrade to the use of precision-guided missiles.
“We will not allow that regime to entrench itself militarily in Syria, as it seeks to do, for the express purpose of eradicating our state,” Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said during a visit to Washington in December.
Why is what happened now different from previous Israeli strikes?
Israel has carried out a number of significant attacks in Syria in recent months, but the latest incident is different. Israel says the episode began with an Iranian drone crossing into its territory from Syria in the early hours of Saturday. The IDF later released footage that it said showed the drone being brought down by an attack helicopter.
Iran has denied this, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahran Qasemi calling the claim “ridiculous.” If it is true, however, it would appear to mark a significant provocation from Tehran and perhaps even an attempt to bait Israel into a reaction.
Israel soon sent fighter jets into Syria to attack the T4 military base near the Syrian city of Palmyra, from which the drone supposedly was launched. Syrian forces in turn responded with what the Israeli military called “substantial Syrian antiaircraft fire,” which appears to have caused the crash of an Israeli fighter jet after its two-member crew ejected.
The crew members were taken to hospital; one is reported to be in a serious condition.
In a statement, Hezbollah said that the downing of the Israeli F-16 marked a “new strategic phase” in the conflict. “Today’s developments mean the old equations have categorically ended,” the group said in a statement.
After the downing of the fighter jet, the IDF struck again, targeting 12 military sites in Syria – eight Syrian and four that it says were Iranian – marking Israel’s most significant strikes in Syria in decades. Brig. Gen. Tomer Bar, second-in-command of Israel’s air force, told Haaretz newspaper that these strikes were “the biggest and most significant attack the air force has conducted against Syrian air defenses” since the 1982 Lebanon War.
If Israel became more militarily involved in the conflict, what would it mean for the Syrian war – and the wider region?
Open conflict across the Syrian border is unlikely to be in the interest of either Israel or Iran-aligned forces at the moment. But the tit-for-tat fighting shows that neither side is willing to back down. If the conflict escalates, it could end up adding a dangerous angle to the ongoing Syrian conflict – and one that could wind up involving other powers in the region and beyond.
The T4 military base struck by Israel houses not only Syrian soldiers but Russian military officers, too. Some Israeli observers have said it is hard to imagine that the Russians there would not have known about the Iranian drone or the subsequent antiaircraft fire. Awkwardly, late last month, Netanyahu visited Moscow to push Russia to rein in its Iranian allies in Syria.
The United States, a key Israeli ally, is already involved in the Syrian conflict, backing Syrian rebels, and at times has found itself at odds with Russia. This past week, U.S. warplanes bombed pro-government forces after they allegedly advanced on U.S.-backed forces in the eastern province of Deir al-Zour. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has said it is unclear whether Russian contractors were among those involved in that advance.
The U.S.- and Russian-backed forces had a common enemy in the Islamic State, but as the fight against IS forces is winding down, new conflicts seem to be rising in Syria. Turkey, for example, recently launched its own offensive against Kurdish fighters in Syria’s north, placing it in de facto opposition to the United States, which had allied itself with some Kurdish forces to defeat Islamic State forces.
An open conflict between Israel and Iranian-backed forces would add to the entanglements and chaos in Syria. It would also risk pulling neighboring Lebanon or other Arab states into a new war, too.