UNESCO Again Ignores Jewish Ties to Har HaBayis

Ultra Orthodox Jews attend a priestly blessing at the Western Wall as the sun rises on on May 25, 2016, in Jerusalem's Old City. Photo by Yossi Zamir/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** ׳”׳›׳•׳×׳œ ׳ž׳¢׳¨׳‘׳™ ׳ž׳×׳₪׳œ׳œ ׳ž׳×׳₪׳œ׳œ׳™׳ ׳×׳₪׳™׳œ׳” ׳›׳•׳”׳ ׳™׳ ׳›׳”׳ ׳™׳ ׳‘׳¨׳›׳” ׳‘׳¨׳›׳× ׳”׳›׳”׳ ׳™׳ ׳™׳¨׳•׳©׳œ׳™׳ ׳¢׳™׳¨ ׳¢׳×׳™׳§׳”
(Yossi Zamir/Flash90)

An important panel at the United Nations Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization (UNESCO) on Wednesday morning approved another absurd anti-Semitic resolution that ignores Jewish ties to Har HaBayis.

The resolution, which accuses Israel of various violations, refers to the Temple Mount compound solely by its Muslim names, “Al-Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif,” and defined it only as “a Muslim holy site of worship.”

Wednesday’s decision came a week after a similar resolution was approved by the body and elicited angry responses from Israel, several world leaders and even the body’s own director general.

Convening at its annual meeting in Paris, UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee adopted Draft Resolution 40COM 7A.13, entitled “Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls,” by a large majority, with 10 countries voting in favor, eight abstaining and two opposing the text. Eight “yes” votes were needed for the resolution to pass.

Jamaica was absent and did not participate in the vote.

This year’s member countries of the committee made things particularly difficult for Israeli diplomats battling the resolution. Germany, Colombia and Japan, all sympathetic to Israel, are no longer involved, and in their place are Tunisia, Kuwait, Lebanon and Indonesia, bringing to nine the total number of Muslim countries. Those nine and Vietnam were all assumed to have voted for the resolution. Poland, Finland, Croatia, and Portugal, the four European countries, had indicated they would abstain.

The 21 nations with voting rights on the World Heritage Committee were: Finland, Poland, Portugal, Croatia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, South Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Tunisia, Kuwait, Lebanon, Peru, Cuba, Jamaica, Burkina Faso, Zimbabwe, Angola and Tanzania.

“This is yet another absurd resolution against the State of Israel, the Jewish people and historical truth,” Israel’s ambassador to UNESCO, Carmel Shama-Hacohen, said after the vote.

The fate of the resolution would be no different from United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, which equated Zionism with racism, he predicted, noting that that resolution was overturned 16 years after its adoption in 1975. Recalling that Israel’s ambassador to the U.N. at the time, Chaim Herzog, tore apart a copy of that resolution, he said that UNESCO’s resolution on Yerushalayim belonged in the garbage bin of history.

I have no intention of doing this today — not because of your dignity, or the dignity of this organization, but because it is not even worthy of the energy needed for tearing it apart,” the Israeli envoy said, before proceeding to lift up a black dustbin with the word “History” on it and placing a copy of the text inside.

Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, also condemned the decision.

The absurdity continues, and UNESCO has adopted yet another ridiculous decision that is completely disconnected from reality,” he said in a statement. “UNESCO embarrassed itself by marching to the tune of the Palestinian pipers. All attempts to deny our heritage, distort history and disconnect the Jewish people from our capital and our homeland, are doomed to fail.”

In a statement to the Associated Press, U.S. Ambassador Crystal Nix Hines criticized the resolutions, which he said were “continuously one-sided and inflammatory.”

“This item should have been defeated,” said Nix Hines. “These politicized and one-sided resolutions are damaging the credibility of UNESCO.”

At the opening of Wednesday’s session, the chairperson of the World Heritage Committee, Turkish diplomat Lale Ülker, proposed that the resolution be adopted “by consensus,” which would have given the appearance of a unanimous decision. A majority of member states supported her proposal, but Tanzania and Croatia asked for a secret ballot. Despite vociferous opposition by Lebanon, Tunisia, Cuba and other states that pushed for “consensus,” the committee’s legal adviser eventually ruled that a secret ballot would be held on the resolution, paving the way for the two “no” votes and the eight abstentions.

Despite frantic Israeli efforts to convince some of the committee’s member states to oppose the resolution, its eventual adoption did not come as a surprise to anyone in Yerushalayim.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said late Tuesday night that UNESCO’s second vote on the matter within a few days showed the organization remains a “theater of the absurd.” He said that while “extremist Muslim forces are destroying mosques and churches, Israel is the only country in the region that protects them and allows freedom of worship.”

According to Shama-Hacohen, Netanyahu instructed him to work to convince countries likely to abstain to go further and cast a vote against the resolution, arguing that an abstention would be akin to support.

Israel respects Muslim and other faiths and their presence in our holiest of places, and it is tragic that the other side doesn’t have a leadership that will do the same, but rather one that is engaged only in doing the exact opposite,” Shama-Hacohen said Tuesday during a meeting with UNESCO’s director general, Irina Bokova. “This is no longer an Israeli-Palestinian struggle, but an Arab struggle against the entire Jewish world. It is clear that Israel and the Jewish people will survive this, yet it remains unclear whether UNESCO will.”

Shama-Hacohen and the heads of two Israeli advocacy groups, StandWithUs and the International Legal Forum, handed Bokova a petition signed by more than 77,000 Jews and Christians calling on UNESCO “to recognize the irrefutable deep historic, cultural and religious connection between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel.”

The adoption of the resolution creates an absurd situation whereby the archaeological digs on and around the site of the Temple Mount, which have unearthed copious evidence of a Jewish connection to the site, may now be designated as destruction of the Muslim site.

To Read The Full Story

Are you already a subscriber?
Click to log in!