The New York Times Co. said Wednesday that it is putting The Boston Globe and its related assets up for sale four years after it called off a previous attempt to sell the newspaper.
Mark Thompson, The Times’ chief executive, said in a statement a sale would be in the best long-term interests of both properties, “given the differences between these businesses and The New York Times.”
The newspapers’ differences are stark. The Times has a national — even international — audience. Last year, it even launched a Chinese-language website. The Globe is focused on its readers in the New England region.
Thompson said the sale would help the company focus on The New York Times’ brand and allow the company to devote more resources to journalism.
Along with the Globe, The Times plans to sell the Worcester Telegram & Gazette; its related websites; the Globe’s direct mail marketing company, GlobeDirect; and a 49 percent interest in Metro Boston, a free daily newspaper for commuters.
The Times bought the Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion from the family of Stephen Taylor, a former Globe executive. But the newspaper has faced difficulties in recent years as advertisers cut spending on newspapers and moved more ads online.
A round of cost-cutting in 2009, which involved pay cuts, helped put the newspaper on better financial footing. It prompted The Times to call off a planned sale and rebuff the offers of several bidders. In late 2011, the Globe started charging for access to
its online version at BostonGlobe.com. The move helped boost circulation revenues. The Times doesn’t separate Globe revenue from Times revenue in its financial statements. But The Globe had an average weekday circulation of 230,351 in the six months through September, up 12 percent from a year ago.
Analyst Edward Atorino with The Benchmark Co. said he views the sale as part of a strategy by the Sulzberger family that controls the Times Co. to delist as a public company and go private.
“They’re selling everything not nailed down,” Atorino said. “The family will simply take The Times private. That’s the only logical end game.”