Obama: Top Intel Official Reviewing Secret 9/11 Material

WASHINGTON (AP) —
In this photo taken Feb. 9, 2016, Director of the National Intelligence James Clapper speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Intelligence agencies are considering eliminating the government’s lowest category of classified information _ a step a top official has said could simplify the system used to guard intelligence and could prevent unnecessary secrecy. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

President Barack Obama says the top-ranking U.S. intelligence official is reviewing classified material in a Sept. 11 report that families of attack victims and some lawmakers are demanding be made public.

Several members of the House and Senate, including House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, have joined 9/11 families in pressuring for declassification of 28 pages that are part of government documents compiled on the 9/11 attack amid speculation of a possible role by Saudi Arabia. Nearly 3,000 Americans died in the attack.

In an interview with CBS’s Charlie Rose, Obama was asked if he had read the 28 pages. “I have a sense of what’s in there,” he replied.

Obama also revealed that James Clapper, director of National Intelligence, “has been going through this” to ensure that whatever is made public does not damage U.S. national security interests.

“My understanding is that he’s about to complete that process,” the president said.

Former U.S. Sen. Robert Graham, who helped write the report that includes the 28 redacted pages, recently told CBS the secret material could reveal possible Saudi backing for the men who hijacked airplanes, flying two into the World Trade Center in New York and another into the Pentagon. A third hijacked plane crashed on Sept. 11, 2001, in western Pennsylvania.

Graham, a Democrat, declined to cite any details on the portion of the report that remains classified.

Obama also voiced concerns about a legislative move to allow victim families to bring lawsuits against other countries believed to have provided support for attacks.

“This is a matter of how generally the United States approaches our interactions with other countries,” he said. “If we open up the possibility that individuals and the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries.”

 

To Read The Full Story

Are you already a subscriber?
Click to log in!