Supreme Court to Rule on Yerushalayim Birthplace Law

WASHINGTON (Reuters) —

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to weigh the constitutionality of a law that was designed to allow American citizens born in Yerushalayim to have Israel listed as their birthplace on passports.

The case concerns a long-standing U.S. foreign policy that the president — and not Congress — has sole authority to state who controls Yerushalayim. Seeking to remain neutral on the hotly contested issue, the U.S. State Department allows passports to name Yerushalayim as a place of birth, but no country name is included.

The State Department, which issues passports and reports to the president, has declined to enforce the law passed by Congress in 2002, saying it violated the separation of executive and legislative powers laid out in the United States.Constitution.

In court papers, President Obama’s administration said taking sides on the issue could “critically compromise the ability of the United States to work with Israelis, Palestinians and others in the region to further the peace process.”

The government has noted that U.S. citizens born in other places in the region where sovereignty has not been established, including Yehuda and Shomron and the Gaza Strip, are similarly prevented from stating a country of birth on their passports.

In 2003, Ari and Naomi Zivotofsky, the parents of U.S. citizen Menachem Zivotofsky, who was born in Yerushalayim in 2002, filed a lawsuit seeking to enforce the law. They would like their son’s passport to say he was born in Israel.
The issue reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 on the preliminary question of whether it was so political that it did not belong in the courts. The high court ruled 8-1 that the case could proceed, setting up a July 2013 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that struck the law down.

An estimated 50,000 American citizens were born in Yerushalayim and could, if they requested it, list Israel as their birthplace if the law was enforced.

Oral arguments and a decision are due in the court’s next term, which begins in October and ends in June 2015.
The case is Zivotofsky v. Kerry, U.S. Supreme Court, 13-628.

To Read The Full Story

Are you already a subscriber?
Click to log in!